|
He has a wonderful writing style which I admire, however I didn't like this particular book. He wrote very little about his students, and very little about his teaching life. Most of it was about his sad childhood and his extramarital affairs.
McCourt honestly portrays his weaknesses as a young teacher; his lack of preparation accompanied by a crippling deficiency of self-esteem, do not add up to an effective teacher. Not up to his earlier workTEACHER MAN continues McCourt's autobiographical journey started in Angela's Ashes: A Memoir. Bouncing from job to job, running afoul of narrow-minded administrators, and an aborted pursuit of a doctorate back in Ireland provides the reader with some understanding of McCourt's life, but this book lacks the dark poetry McCourt has shown he's capable of. With this book McCourt's takes the reader through his thirty years as an educator in NYC public school system. His career starts out far less than promising, with unmotivated students being led by an ill-prepared teacher. The episodic nature of the book is very disjointed, years pass with hardly a mention, and McCourt's joy as an educator only really arrives when he starts to teach students who actually thrive in an academic environment. Creative lessons do make an appearance and brighten up the book, but the overall effect pales in comparison to McCourt's earlier work.
Spoken by the author, this memoir provides a great glimpse into his character and wit. Mom loves it.
It goes quickly. I hated doing the sentence thing, I would have understood better with his PEN idea.
I listened on CD, Frank himself read the book, it would not have been the same by any other person. I was so touched by this one.
It also allowed them to hear other points of view on different topics. I often wonder if he was too hard on himself.
The idea of his students writing excuse notes from Adam to God, or Eve to God got their creative juices going. Just read the book.
I had the CD playing in my house while cleaning, in my car while commuting, it was fascinating.
For example, a math teacher is supposed to make sure his students learn math and become proficient at it. So I think that McCourt's spat with the school officials was important. Some would ask simply: "Did I learn what I was supposed to learn in this class." If so, they would give the teacher a high grade. Being a teacher myself, and having enjoyed McCourt's first book, I decided to pick up Teacher Man. It takes both, and I believe McCourt tried to do both. To Sir, With Love, Lean on Me, and Conroy's The Water is Wide may be a little more similar to McCourt's story in that the students learned some "non-intellectual" lessons about life as shared by the teacher directly or indirectly.
To some degree, they did this by 1)caring about the students and 2) convincing them the learning would pay off in some important ways.
This is what happened in some "classroom" movies such as Mr.
In that sense, I think we was successful to some extent and I do applaud him for caring enough to expose his life deeply to his students.
I suppose there are a number of definitions or opinions of what constitutes an exceptional or effective teacher.
He saw a glimmer of potential that some of his life experiences could somehow help, enlighten, or motivate the students in this crazy business of life, and he fought the establishment to some degree to make teaching about the real stuff, the hard stuff of life.
Holland's Opus (music), Stand and Deliver (math), and Dead Poet's Society (literature).
However the draw of these movies was that these teachers were able to take bored,angry, underachieving students and convince them of the value of learning.
My best teachers were ones who showed they cared about me but also knew how to teach.
Good book.
|